General Principles of Modern Immunosuppressive Therapy
Abstract
Immunosuppressive therapy is the most important component of drug treatment after organ transplantation. The goal of immunosuppression is to prevent acute and chronic rejection while maximizing patient survival, and long-term graft survival remains a major therapeutic challenge before and after organ transplantation. However, the benefits of immunosuppressive therapy must be balanced against the side effects and underlying toxicity of the drugs used.
Immunosuppressants can be classified as induction agents, maintenance therapy, treatment of acute rejection and chronic rejection, and antibody directed therapy. Although induction therapy remains a subject of debate in the field of organ transplantation, it is still used in most transplant centers. Protocols for maintenance immunosuppressive therapy are more or less standardized and include, as a rule, three drugs, a calcineurin inhibitor, an antimetabolite, and a glucocorticoid. The presence of HLA antibodies in transplantation candidates and the development of de novo antibodies after transplantation remain a serious therapeutic problem before and after organ transplantation. In this lecture, we will look at the drugs used to induce and maintain immunosuppression, as well as their effectiveness in preventing side effects.
References
- Enderby C, Keller CA. An overview of immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation. Am J Manag Care. 2015 Jan;21(1 Suppl):s12-23.
- Ch Sandimmune (cyclosporine) [package insert]. East Hanover, NJ: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp; 2013.
- Neoral (cyclosporine modified) [package insert]. East Hanover, NJ: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp; 2013.
- Prograf (tacrolimus) [package insert]. Northbrook, IL: Astellas Pharma US; 2013.
- Imuran (azathioprine) [package insert]. San Diego, CA: Prometheus Laboratories; 2011.
- Cellcept (mycophenolate mofetil) [package insert]. South San Francisco, CA: Genentech, Inc; 2013.
- Myfortic (mycophenolic acid) [package insert]. East Hanover, NJ: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp; 2013.
- Rapamune (sirolimus) [package insert]. Philadelphia, PA: Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc; 2012.
- Zortress (everolimus) [package insert]. East Hanover, NJ: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp; 2018.
- Wiesner RH, Fung JJ. Present state of immunosuppressive therapy in liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl. 2011 Nov;17 Suppl 3:S1-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.22410.
- Karam S, Wali RK. Current State of Immunosuppression: Past, Present, and Future. Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression. 2015;25(2):113-134. https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevEukaryotGeneExpr.2015011421.
- Johnson C, Ahsan N, Gonwa T, Halloran P, Stegall M, Hardy M, et al. Randomized trial of tacrolimus (Prograf) in combination with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (Neoral) with mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 2000 Mar 15;69(5):834-841. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-200003150-00028.
- Krämer BK, Montagnino G, Del Castillo D, Margreiter R, Sperschneider H, Olbricht CJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin A microemulsion in renal transplantation: 2-year follow-up results. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005 May;20(5):968-973. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfh739.
- Ekberg H, Tedesco-Silva H, Demirbas A, Vítko S, Nashan B, Gürkan A, et al. Reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2007 Dec 20;357(25):2562-2575. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa067411.
- Prograf and Advagraf Mix-up. ISMP Canada Safety Bulletin. 2009;9(5):1-2.
- Kuypers DR, Peeters PC, Sennesael JJ, Kianda MN, Vrijens B, Kristanto P, et al. Improved adherence to tacrolimus once-daily formulation in renal recipients: a randomized controlled trial using electronic monitoring. Transplantanion. 2013 Jan 27;95(2):333-340. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0b013e3182725532.
- Spagnoletti G, Gargiulo A, Favi E, et al. Conversion from prograf to extended release tacrolimus in stable kidney transplant recipients: Better renal function after 3 year follow up. Proceedings of the 16th Congress of the European Society for Organ Transplantation and using the Ecosystem; 2013 Sept 8-11; Vienna, Austria. Vienna; 2013.
- Shinichi I, Tomohiro T, Shingo N, et al. Effect of conversion from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus on glucose intolerance in stabil kidney transplant recipient – evaluation at 12 months. Proceedings of the 16th Congress of the European Society for Organ Transplantation and using the Ecosystem; 2013 Sept 8-11; Vienna, Austria. Vienna; 2013.
- Van Os EC, Zins BJ, Sandborn WJ, Mays DC, Tremaine WJ, Mahoney DW, et al. Azathioprine pharmacokinetics after intravenous, oral, delayed release oral and rectal foam administration. Gut. 1996 Jul;39(1):63-68. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.39.1.63.
- Black AJ, McLeod HL, Capell HA, Powrie RH, Matowe LK, Pritchard SC, et al. Thiopurine methyltransferase genotype predicts therapy-limiting severe toxicity from azathioprine. Ann Intern Med. 1998 Nov 1;129(9):716-718. dhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-129-9-199811010-00007.
- Wüthrich RP, Cicvara S, Ambühl PM, Binswanger U. Randomized trial of conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine 6 months after renal allograft transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000 Aug;15(8):1228-1231. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/15.8.1228.
- Ehlayel A, Simms KJA, Ashoor IF. Emerging monitoring technologies in kidney transplantation. Pediatr Nephrol. 2021 Feb 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-021-04929-9. Epub ahead of print.
- Hajkova M, Jaburek F, Porubska B, Bohacova P, Holan V, Krulova M. Cyclosporine A promotes the therapeutic effect of mesenchymal stem cells on transplantation reaction. Clin Sci (Lond). 2019 Nov 15;133(21):2143-2157. https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20190294.