Prospects of the Artificial Organs Structures 3D Printing Technology

  • E. V. Sid Zaporizhzhia Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education of Ministry of Health of Ukraine, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30702/transpaorg/08_20.0112/108-115/77
Keywords: 3D bioprinting; rapid prototyping; biofabrication; tissue engineering

Abstract

Transplantation technologies are now highly effective modern methods of medical care for patients with irreversible stage of chronic diseases of vital organs. The success of transplantology allowed to start solving the problems of improving the quality of patients’ life who live with transplanted organ, their adaptation to society, return to work, to authentic family relationships.

The aim of the study is to perform analysis of modern literary sources related to the prospects of application of artificial organs structures bioprinting 3D technology.
The shortage of donor organs for transplantation, the high cost of traditional transplantation and the problem of immunocompatibility of donor tissues led to the search for alternative, cost-effective and efficient organ replacement technologies. There are different methods of making 3D structures, each of which has its advantages and disadvantages. The technology is selected depending on the properties of the material, the desired characteristics of the finished structure and its application. To date, bioprinters are able to print bone and cartilage implants quickly enough.

Thus, 3D bioprinting is now becoming a real breakthrough in regenerative medicine. Every day there are more and more different techniques to improve this technology.

References

  1. Nikonenko AS. [The state and prospects of development transplantation in Ukraine]. Suchasnі medychnі tekhnolohіi. 2011;3-4:12-14. Russian.
  2. Bagnenko SF, Reznik ON. [Key Problems of Transplantation Development and the Objectives of Higher Medical Education]. Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation. 2017;9(3):192-210. Russian. https://doi.org/10.23873/2074-0506-2017-9-3-192-210
  3. Bezinover D, Saner F. Organ transplantation in the modern era. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Mar 4; 19(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0704-z
  4. Sethi S, Choi J, Toyoda M, Vo A, Peng A, Jordan SC. Desensitization: overcoming the immunologic barriers to transplantation. J Immunol Res. 2017;2017:6804678. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6804678
  5. Allison TL. Immunosuppressive Therapy in Transplantation. Nurs Clin North Am. 2016 Mar;51(1):107-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2015.10.008
  6. Gautier SV. [Transplantology of the 21st century: High technologies in medicine and innovations in biomedical science]. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2017;19(3):10-32.Russian. https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2017-3-10-32
  7. Shulga VM. [State regulation in the field of transplantation of organs and other anatomical materials:concept and nature]. Public administration aspects. 2017;5(3-4(41-42)):26-35. Ukrainian. https://doi.org/10.15421/1520176
  8. Haidar G, Singh N. Viral infections in solid organ transplant recipients: novel updates and a review of the classics. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2017 Dec;30(6):579-588. https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000000409
  9. Mikhel DV, Reznik ON. [Shortage of donor organs as a global problem: cultural differences, inequalities, and alternative strategies of self-sufficiency]. In: Reznik ON, editor. Socio-humanitarian problems of organ donation: interdisciplinary research. Moscow:4Print;2018. p. 11-58. Russian.
  10. Kapitonova EA, Romanovskaya OV, Romanovskii GB. [Legal regulation of transplantation]. Moscow: Prospekt; 2016. Russian.
  11. Matesanz R, Mahillo B, Alvarez M, et al. International figures on donation and transplantation-2014. Newsletter Transplant. Spain: Organización Nacional de Trasplantes. 2015;20:1-64.
  12. Girlanda R. Deceased organ donation for transplantation: challenges and opportunities. World J Transplant. 2016 Sep 24;6(3):451-9. https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v6.i3.451
  13. Hench L, Jones D. [Biomaterials, artificial organs and tissue engineering]. Moscow: Tehnosfera; 2007.
  14. Shtilman MI. [Biomaterials are an important area of biomedical technologies]. Bulletin of Russian State Medical Universit. 2016;5:4-15. Russian.
  15. Gorbatov RO, Romanov AD. [Bioprinting of organs and tissues]. Journal of Volgograd State Medical University, 2017;3(63):3-9. Russian. https://doi.org/10.19163/1994-9480-2017-3(63)-3-9
  16. Medvedev MP, Fomina MA. [3D printing as a new era in medicine]. Novaya nauka: Ot idei k rezultatu. 2016; 4(11):16-19. Russian.
  17. Pisina LM. [Artificial organ. innovative method]. Novaya nauka: Problemi i perspektivi. 2016;53(79):27-29. Russian.
  18. Zhang YS, Yue K, Aleman J, Moghaddam KM, Bakht SM, Yang J, et al. 3D bioprinting for tissue and organ fabrication. Ann Biomed Eng. 2017 Jan;45(1):148-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1612-8
  19. Murphy SV, Atala A. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol. 2014 Aug;32(8):773-85. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958
  20. Wang Q, Xia Q, Wu Y, Zhang X, Wen F, Chen X, et al. 3D-printed atsttrin-incorporated alginate/hydroxyapatite scaffold promotes bone defect regeneration with TNF/TNFR signaling involvement. Adv Healthc Mater. 2015 Aug 5;4(11):1701-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201500211
  21. Mironov VA. [3D same results for bioprinting: organs on any order]. Initsiativi XXI veka. 2013;4:94-100. Russian.
  22. Derby B. Printing and prototyping of tissues and scaffolds. Science. 2012 Nov 16;338(6109):921-6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1226340
  23. Jungling MK, Wood PA, Koike Y. MedTech: 3D Printing – A Solution for Innovation. Morgan Stanley, Blue Paper. 2013 Sept 5.
  24. Shmarin NV, Karelina AA. [3D-bioprinter-printing of donor organs and tissues for transplantology]. Innovatsionnoe razvitie sovremennoi nauki: problemi, zakonomernosti, perspektivi: Proceedings of the 5th International Scientific and Practical Conference; 2017 Dec 10; Penza, Russia. p. 334-336. Russian.
  25. Hesuani YD, Pereira FD, Parfenov V, Koudan E, Mitryashkin A, Replyanski N, et al. Design and implementation of novel multifunctional 3D bioprinter. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing. 2016; 3(1):64-68. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2015.0040
  26. Ozbolat IT, Moncal KK, Gudapati H. Evaluation of bioprinter technologies. Additive Manufacturing. 2017;13:179-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.10.003
  27. Fadeeva SA, Sitdikova ID, Meshkov AV, Kamaletdinova AA, Gordeeva AV, Vasileva EV, et al. [Actual problems of biocomposition of materials of medical purpose in additive technologies]. Advances in Science and Technology: Proceedings of the 15th International Scientific and Practical Conference; 2018 Jule 31; Moscow, Russia. Moscow; 2018. p. 28-30.
  28. Richards D, Jia J, Yost M, Markwald R, Mei Y. 3D bioprinting for vascularized tissue fabrication. Ann Biomed Eng. 2017 Jan;45(1):132-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1653-z
  29. Neff EP. Printing cures: Organovo advances with 3D-printed liver tissue. Lab Anim (NY). 2017 Feb 17;46(3):57. https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.1203
  30. Khademhosseini A, Camci-Unal G, editors. 3D Bioprinting in Regenerative Engineering: Principles and Applications. 1st ed. Boca Raton:CRC Press;2018. https://doi.org/10.1201/b21916
  31. Choudhury D, Anand S, Naing MW. The arrival of commercial bioprinters - Towards 3D bioprinting revolution. Int J Bioprint. 2018 Jun 17;4(2):139. https://doi.org/10.18063/IJB.v4i2.139
  32. Tokarev BE, Tokarev RB. [Market outlook analysis of the 3D bio-printing technologies]. Internet-zhurnal Naukovedenie [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Aug 01];2(8):[about 16 p.]. Available from: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/33EVN216.pdf. Russian.
Published
2020-12-16
How to Cite
Sid, E. V. (2020). Prospects of the Artificial Organs Structures 3D Printing Technology. Transplantation and Artificial Organs, (1(01), 109-116. https://doi.org/10.30702/transpaorg/08_20.0112/108-115/77
Issue
Transplantation and artificial organs №1(01) 2020
Section
REVIEWS